Huntington Beach TribuneCity Hall
Saturday, October 10, 2026 Search Subscribe
Huntington Beach, covered daily

Planning commission upholds approval of two Pecan Avenue ADUs

Commissioners denied Council Member Pat Burns' appeal of the zoning administrator's coastal development permit, citing state law limits.

The Planning Commission denied Pat Burns’ appeal on Sept. 8, upholding the denial of two detached ADUs at 205 Pecan Ave.
The Planning Commission denied Pat Burns’ appeal on Sept. 8, upholding the denial of two detached ADUs at 205 Pecan Ave.
Taromsky, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

The Huntington Beach Planning Commission on Sept. 8 denied an appeal of the zoning administrator's approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 26-006, which allows two detached accessory dwelling units at 205 Pecan Avenue. The decision upholds the permit for the ADU project and can be appealed to the City Council within ten working days.

The appellant was Council Member Pat Burns, according to the staff report. The applicant is Marcus Kemmerer of 228 Crest Avenue, and the property owner is UPOP, LLC of 6602 Cedarwood Drive. The project proposes two detached ADUs of approximately 420 and 480 square feet on an existing multi-family property at an overall height of two stories and 18 feet. The site sits at 205 Pecan Avenue, at the northwest corner of Lake Street and Pecan Avenue.

The proposal calls for two detached ADUs of about 420 and 480 square feet on an existing multi-family property.
The proposal calls for two detached ADUs of about 420 and 480 square feet on an existing multi-family property.
Grendelkhan, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

The staff report recommended finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15303, Class 3, for new construction or conversion of small structures, and approving the permit with suggested findings and conditions of approval. The commission's options were to uphold the zoning administrator's decision, with or without modifications, deny the findings, or continue the item and direct staff accordingly.

During deliberations, commissioners voiced frustration that state ADU statutes restrict the city's ability to require parking and other development standards. Several said the city risks losing on appeal or being sued if it denies statutorily protected ADUs. Staff said state law limits local parking requirements for qualifying ADUs and pointed to a nearby transit stop as an exemption.

Commissioners also raised concerns that state ADU exemptions for parking could worsen downtown parking and affect coastal access. One commissioner warned that denying a lawful ADU permit would likely result in an appeal or litigation and urged caution. The discussion reflected the broader tension between local control and state housing law that has surfaced repeatedly in Huntington Beach land use debates.

The project proposes two detached ADUs on an existing multi-family property at 205 Pecan Ave.
The project proposes two detached ADUs on an existing multi-family property at 205 Pecan Ave.
Joiedevivre123321, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Source

The staff report laid out suggested findings supporting approval, noting the project met applicable zoning and coastal development standards for the site, and recommended conditions of approval governing construction and operation. The report framed the zoning administrator's decision as consistent with state ADU law, which sharply limits the grounds on which a local government may deny a qualifying project.

The applicant and a long-term Huntington Beach resident urged the commission to approve the project. They said the ADUs represent significant private investment, will provide housing for family members and qualify under state rules, which allow approval if the ADUs do not modify existing parking. Commissioners ultimately sided with that reading of state law and denied the appeal, upholding the zoning administrator's approval.

Filed under:
  • planning commission
  • housing
  • ADUs
  • zoning
Data reporter

Jules Ferreira is the Tribune's data reporter, covering public records and data-driven reporting.

Corrections
We correct errors promptly and note them here. Request a correction through our contact form.

More from City Hall

Council to hold October 6 hearing on downtown business assessment for fiscal 2026-27

The annual Downtown Business Improvement District review covers a $1,044,500 budget; Resolution No. 2026-26 would declare the city intention to continue the assessment.

By Jordan Pruitt · Oct 6, 2026

Ten-year forecast warns of deepening deficits, pension strain

City finance staff project expenditures outpacing revenues over the decade, driven by CalPERS costs and personnel growth, and list revenue options.

By Casey Lindgren · Sep 3, 2026

Council approves $9.8 million police raises in 4-3 vote

The contract gives rank-and-file officers a 17 percent raise through June 2029, as a finance forecast warns the deal deepens a structural deficit.

By Jordan Pruitt · Sep 2, 2026
Read nextCouncil to hold October 6 hearing on downtown business assessment for fiscal 2026-27